THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S AUTHORITY TO DECIDE ON REGIONAL ELECTION DISPUTES FOLLOWING CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 85/PUU-XX/2022
Kewenangan, Sengketa Pilkada, Mahkamah Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/jpkmhm.v5i1.1100Keywords:
Authority, Regional Election Disputes, Constitutional CourtAbstract
Based on the Judicial Power Law, the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the first and final level, with its decisions being final, to decide disputes over the results of Regional Head Elections (Pilkada). This authority includes disputes regarding vote acquisition that affect the determination of elected candidate pairs at the provincial and district/city levels. The distinction between the Election and Pilkada regimes stems from Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU-XI/2013, which resulted in the Constitutional Court not having the authority to examine and adjudicate disputes regarding Pilkada results. However, as long as the Special Judicial Body has not been formed, the Constitutional Court remains authorized to examine and adjudicate such cases..
References
Ubaedillah dan Abdul Rozak, Pancasila, Demokrasi, HAM, dan Masyarakat Madani, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2013.
Bagir Manan, Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah, FH UII, Yogyakarta, 2014,
C.F. Strong, Konstitusi-Konstitusi Politik Modern, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2011.
Dahlan Thaib, Implementasi Sistem Ketatanegaraan Menurut UUD 1945, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2013
Hamdan Zoelva, Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2013.
I Dewa Gede Atmadja, Sistem Pemilihan Langsung dan Pertanggung jawaban Kepala Daerah, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Bali, 2014.
Janedjri M. Gaffar, Politik Hukum Pemilu. Konstitusi Press (Konpress), Jakarta, 2012,
Jimly Asshiddiqqie, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Syaamil Cipta Media, Jakarta, 2016.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bloch, F. S. (Ed.). (2011). The global clinical movement: Educating lawyers for social justice. Oxford University Press.
National Cyber and Cryptography Agency (BSSN). (2024). Indonesia's cybersecurity annual report 2023. BSSN of the Republic of Indonesia.
Hidayat, A., Nugroho, B., & Ramadhani, C. (2023). The effectiveness of experiential legal education programs in improving people's digital legal literacy. Journal of Legal and Human Rights Education, 11(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.20885/jpham.vol11.iss2.art5
Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI). (2024). Child protection complaint data in the field of pornography and cybercrime 2022-2023. KPAI of the Republic of Indonesia.
Nashriana. (2023). Criminal law protection for children in Indonesia (4th edition). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 2 of 2024 concerning the Classification and Security of Internet Content. (2024). Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia.
Prasetyo, B., & Andayani, T. R. (2022). Cyberbullying in Indonesian adolescents: Prevalence, characteristics, and psychological impact. Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.7454/jps.2022.5
Raharjo, S. T., & Astuti, S. I. (2023). Legal protection of children victims of cybercrime: A normative and empirical analysis in Indonesia. Journal of Law IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 30(3), 521-545. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss3.art4
Sitompul, A. (2022). Internet law and user protection in Indonesia (revised edition). CV Utomo
.png){kind=logo}
