PUBLICATION ETHICS
Publication Ethics Statement
JMEB (Journal of Meta Economics and Business) is a peer-reviewed national journal. This statement
describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including authors, editor-in-chief, Editorial Board, peer-reviewers, and publisher (LPPM Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Tholabul Ilmi). This statement is based on Guidelines Practice Best COPE for Editors Journal.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
Publishing articles in peer-reviewed JMEB (Journal of Meta Economics and Business) journals is important
in developing knowledge networks. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the author's work and the
institution that supports it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public.

Publication decision
The journal editor of JMEB (Journal of Meta Economics and Business) is responsible for deciding which
articles to publish to the journal. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should support the decision. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by legal requirements that would apply regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making these decisions.

Fair play
The editors at all times evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the race,
gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff should not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone
other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher as
appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

Reviewer Tasks
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors in improving the paper.

Speed
Reviewers who feel unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or know that prompt
review is not possible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. They should not be
shown or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Objectivity Standard
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers
should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Recognition
Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Reviewers should also bring to the editor's attention any similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or connection with any author, company, or institution associated with the paper.

Author Assignment
Reporting standards
The author of the original research report should present an accurate account of the work done as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately presented in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Deceptive or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are requested to provide raw data in connection with papers for editorial review, and should be
prepared to provide public access to such data (in accordance with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any case be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
Authors should ensure that they have written a completely original piece of work, and if the author has
used the work and/or words of others, then these have been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, redundant, or simultaneous publications
An author should not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously constitutes unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Source Recognition
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications
that were influential in determining the nature of the work reported.

Paper Writing
Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. If there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have approved its submission forpublication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that
could be construed to influence the outcome or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his or her published work, it is the author's
obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or
correct the paper