THE ROLE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AS EXECUTOR IN CRIMINAL CASE DECISIONS THAT HAVE PERMANENT LEGAL FORCE

Jaksa Penuntut Umum, Putusan, Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap

Authors

  • Cut Nurita Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Nusantara Tarigan Silangit Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Ridwan Lubis Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah Medan
  • Syarifuddin Syarifuddin Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Misnan Al Jawi Universitas Al-Washliyah Medan
  • Mhd Taufiqurrahman Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47652/jpkmhm.v5i1.1102

Keywords:

Public Prosecutor, Decision, Permanent Legal Force.

Abstract

The implementation of a judge's decision that has permanent legal force is the most important part of the judicial process because this is where the real enforcement of justice is. The role of the public prosecutor as the executor of a court decision in a criminal case that has permanent legal force is to be able to carry out the execution based on an excerpt of the court decision. A copy of the decision or excerpt of the decision (criminal) that has been sent to the parties (defendant and prosecutor's office), then the excerpt of the criminal decision can be used as the basis for execution, because it contains the verdict or dictum of the decision, but the legal considerations are no longer included. The mechanism for implementing a court decision in a criminal case that has permanent legal force is that the clerk must send a copy of the decision to the prosecutor's office to be implemented by the public prosecutor. The obstacles to its resolution faced by the public prosecutor as the executor of a court decision in a case that has permanent legal force are decisions that have permanent legal force but a copy of the decision has not been submitted to the prosecutor's office.

References

Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2015.

Andi Sofyan dan Abd. Asis, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014.

Ali Yusmandi, Darwan Prinst, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik, Pedoman Ilmu Jaya. Jakarta. 2015.

Badra Nawawi Arief. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana , Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.

Bambang Sunggono., Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta, 2013.

Bambang Waluyo, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2000.

Darwan Prinst, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik, Djambatan, Jakarta, 2019.

H.M.A. Kuffal, Penerapan KUHAP dalam Praktik Hukum, UMM Press, Malang, 2017.

Marwan Effendy, Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, Posisi dan Fungsinya dari Perspektif Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, 2017.

Bloch, F. S. (Ed.). (2011). The global clinical movement: Educating lawyers for social justice. Oxford University Press.

National Cyber and Cryptography Agency (BSSN). (2024). Indonesia's cybersecurity annual report 2023. BSSN of the Republic of Indonesia.

Hidayat, A., Nugroho, B., & Ramadhani, C. (2023). The effectiveness of experiential legal education programs in improving people's digital legal literacy. Journal of Legal and Human Rights Education, 11(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.20885/jpham.vol11.iss2.art5

Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI). (2024). Child protection complaint data in the field of pornography and cybercrime 2022-2023. KPAI of the Republic of Indonesia.

Nashriana. (2023). Criminal law protection for children in Indonesia (4th edition). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 2 of 2024 concerning the Classification and Security of Internet Content. (2024). Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia.

Prasetyo, B., & Andayani, T. R. (2022). Cyberbullying in Indonesian adolescents: Prevalence, characteristics, and psychological impact. Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.7454/jps.2022.5

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

Nurita, C., Silangit, N. T., Lubis, M. R., Syarifuddin, S., Al Jawi, M., & Taufiqurrahman, M. (2026). THE ROLE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AS EXECUTOR IN CRIMINAL CASE DECISIONS THAT HAVE PERMANENT LEGAL FORCE: Jaksa Penuntut Umum, Putusan, Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Hablum Minannas, 5(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jpkmhm.v5i1.1102