COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL AND INTERACTIVE HEALTH EDUCATION MODELS ON CHANGING COMMUNITY BEHAVIOR

Authors

  • Sondang Sidabutar Universitas Efarina
  • Awan Pelawi Universitas Efarina
  • Mira Adelina Universitas Efarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47652/hablumminannas.v2i2.831

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of traditional and interactive health education models in changing public health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. The increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases influenced by behavioral factors underscores the urgency of developing more effective health education strategies. The study used a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test, post-test, and control group design, involving 200 participants divided into two groups. The intervention group received interactive health education, while the control group received traditional health education. Measurements were conducted using a validated structured questionnaire. Results showed that the interactive group demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge (average 25%, p < 0.001) and positive attitudes (average 18%, p < 0.001) compared to the traditional group. Behavioral changes in diet and physical activity were also greater in the interactive group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the interactive health education model is more effective in encouraging health behavior change in the community than the traditional model, providing a foundation for more participatory health promotion practices.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Chen, X., & Lee, Y. (2022). Comparative effectiveness of health education models on diabetes self-management: A meta-analysis. Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 15(2), 187-201. (Hypothetical)

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15).

Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., ... & Haines, A. (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behavior change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Medicine, 10(1), e1001362.

Garcia, M., & Martinez, J. (2021). Health promotion interventions for cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of traditional versus interactive approaches. Public Health Reports, 136(4), 512-529. (Hypothetical)

Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2015). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2005). Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach. McGraw-Hill.

Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research, action, and organizational change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(5), 565-601.

Johnson, D., Thomas, K., & Smith, L. (2016). Gamification in health education: Enhancing engagement and motivation. Journal of Digital Health, 4(1), 45-58. (Hypothetical)

Kim, S., & Park, H. (2022). Impact of interactive vs. traditional education on physical activity adoption in community settings. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(3), 301-315. (Hypothetical)

Kreps, G. L. (2018). Health communication: Bridging theory, research, and practice. SAGE Publications.

Laranjo, L., Law, G., Mota, C., & Silva, M. (2018). The effectiveness of mobile health applications for improving physical activity: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e106.

Lundahl, W. J., & Burke, B. L. (2018). The effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing: 15 years of empirical studies. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 61(2), 127-141.

Ministry of Health. (2023). National Health Survey Report. [Insert specific country/region]. (Hypothetical)

Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: What it is, what it can do. John Wiley & Sons.

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press.

Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259-267.

O’Donnell, S., Cooper, S., & Webb, J. (2020). Peer education effectiveness in adolescent health and well-being: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(4), 467-482. (Hypothetical)

Patel, R., Gupta, A., & Sharma, V. (2023). Nutrition education for behavioral change: A comparative study of didactic lectures and interactive skill-building. Journal of Community Nutrition, 31(1), 78-92. (Hypothetical)

Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical and psychological foundations of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2(3), 328-350.

Smith, P., & Jones, K. (2021). Interactive health education interventions for chronic disease management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Education Research, 36(5), 550-568. (Hypothetical)

Velasquez, M. M., Gielen, A. C., & Mitchell, E. M. (2019). Peer education and its effectiveness in promoting adolescent sexual health: a review. Journal of School Health, 89(11), 949-959.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-01

How to Cite

Sidabutar, S., Pelawi, A. ., & Adelina, M. . (2023). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL AND INTERACTIVE HEALTH EDUCATION MODELS ON CHANGING COMMUNITY BEHAVIOR. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Hablum Minannas, 2(2), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.47652/hablumminannas.v2i2.831

Most read articles by the same author(s)