A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL CRIMINAL ACTION OF MONEY IN THE FORM OF SUBSTITUTE CRIMINAL (Study of Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 110 K/Pid.Sus/2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v3i3.692Keywords:
Crime, Replacement Money, CorruptionAbstract
Payment of replacement money in corruption cases can save state money that has been corrupted. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the mechanism for payment of replacement money to return state losses in corruption cases, the obstacles faced in the process of payment of replacement money to return state losses in corruption cases, how the legal considerations of judges in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 110 K / Pid.Sus / 2024 related to payment of replacement money to return state losses in corruption cases. The results of the study, namely the obstacles faced in the process of paying substitute money to return state losses in corruption cases, are that the handling of corruption cases has been carried out in an extraordinary manner, but there are still obstacles concerning the confiscation of assets that do not yet have a legal umbrella, confiscation of assets, and audits of the calculation of state financial losses that do not reach the level of the flow of money and the Perception of the Executing Prosecutor regarding the Judge's verdict. The legal consideration of the judge in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 110 K/Pid.Sus/2024 regarding the payment of replacement money for the return of state losses in corruption cases is that the defendant has enjoyed money from the crime, so based on Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, the Defendant is sentenced to pay replacement money converted with money that the Defendant has deposited with the Public Prosecutor
References
Chaeruddin dkk, Strategi Pencegahan dan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Refika Aditama, Jakarta, 2018
Danil, Elwi, Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana, dan Pemberantasannya. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014.
Darwan Prins, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.
Hamid, Edi Sunandi dan Muhammad Suyuti. Menyingkap Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesia, Aditya Media. Yogyakarta, 2017
Hartanti, Evi, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2015
Hamzah, Andi, Korupsi di Indonesia Masalah dan Pemecahannya, Gramedia. Jakarta, 2014.
Indonesia Corruption Watch, Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi, ICW, Jakarta, 2014.
Kanter, E.Y. dan S.R Sianturi, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Storia Grafika, Jakarta, 2002
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
Sianipar, E. P. U. ., Lubis, M. Y. ., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT (SAMENSPANNING) DALAM KEJAHATAN NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.423
Marzuki, M., Faisal, F., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT PERSETUJUAN BERLAYAR (Studi Putusan Nomor 249/Pid.B/2021/PN Ktp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.424
Mustamam, M., Bachri, H. ., & Mukidi, M. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA MELALUI FUNGSI ASESMEN DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Di Kepolisian Sektor Aceh Selatan). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.425
Gulo, I. E. ., Mukidi, M., & Mustamam, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN DIVERSI DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK ATAS TINDAK KEJAHATAN PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Gunung Sitoli). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.426
.png){kind=logo}
