LEGAL PROTECTION FOR REGISTERED WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS AGAINST PASSING-OFF ACTION BASED ON THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 532 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v3i3.717Keywords:
Registration, Trademark, Good FaithAbstract
A trademark is one of the components of intellectual property rights that needs special attention. Violations or deviant behavior in the field of trademarks will always occur. This is related to fraudulent business behavior that requires competition (competitive) and is profit-oriented, thus opening up the potential for fraudulent or unlawful business activities, and the motivation for someone to commit trademark violations, especially the desire to gain profit in their business practices. The legal consequences for brand hitchhikers in Indonesia according to the Trademark and Geographical Indication Law are that they do not receive legal protection and their registration is canceled and crossed out from the General Register of Trademarks because the act is qualified as containing bad faith and unfair competition.
References
Eddy Damian, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, Alumni, Bandung, 2014.
Erma Wahyuni, Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Hukum Merek, Yayasan Pembaruan Administrasi Publik Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2012.
Gunawan Widjaja, Seri Hukum Bisnis: Lisensi, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta 2011.
Harsono Adisumarto, Hak Milik Intelektual Khususnya Paten dan Merek: Hak Milik Perindustrian (Industrial Property), Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta, 2010.
Heliantoro., Perjanjian Lisensi Dalam Menunjang Pembangunan,Tarsito, Bandung, 2018.
I Gusti Gede Getas¸ Peranan Merek dalam Dunia Usaha, Upad Sastra, Denpasar, 2017.
Insan Budi Maulana, Sukses Bisnis melalui Merek, Paten dan hak Cipta, Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2017.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
Sianipar, E. P. U. ., Lubis, M. Y. ., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT (SAMENSPANNING) DALAM KEJAHATAN NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.423
.png){kind=logo}
