A NORMATIVE LURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS BY JUDGES IN DECIDING THEFT CASES IN THE FAMILY (Study of Decision Number 65/Pid.B/2024/PN.Tbt)

Authors

  • Bambang Irawan Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Nelvetia Purba Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.751

Keywords:

Sanctions, Theft, Family

Abstract

Theft is rampant in society. The current state of society makes it very possible for people to find shortcuts by stealing. From print and electronic media, it is shown that theft crimes often occur with various types which are motivated by unmet living needs, and the perpetrators do not close from their own families. Based on the position of the case and decision number 65 / Pid.B

/ 2024 / Pn.Tbt above, there are legal regulations against perpetrators of criminal acts of theft in the family that have been tried by the Panel of Judges, namely Article 367 of the Criminal Code, Application of Article 367 of the Criminal Code in cases of theft in the family committed by the defendant against the victim which is a complaint offense, in this case the judge applies the elements of Article 367, namely, Whoever takes goods that are entirely or belong to someone else, with the intention of being owned unlawfully, and is carried out by blood relatives or by marriage.

 

References

Abdul Manan, 2012. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Peradilan Agam. Jakarta: Kencana

Adami Chazawi. 2001. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Andi Hamzah. 2001. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Dan Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Arto, Mukti. 2004. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

B. Simandjuntak, 1981. Pengantar Kriminologi Dan Patologi Sosial. Bandung: Tarsito

Djoko Prakoso Dan Agus Imunarso. 1987. Hak Asasi Tersangka Dan Peranan Psikologi Dalam Konteks KUHA, Jakarta: Bina Aksara

E. Utrecht and Moch Saleh Djindang. 1980. Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta. Sinar Harapan

Gerson W. Bawengan. 1979. Hukum Pidana di Dalam Teori dan Praktek.

Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita

H. A. K. Moch. Anwar. 1989. Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP Buku II)

Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hoffman Dalam Komariah Emong Sapardjaja. 2002. Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materil Dalam Hukum Pidana, Studi Kasus Tentang Penerapan Dan Perkembangannya Dalam Yurisprudensi. Bandung: Alumni

Husein Muhammad. 2001. Fiqih Perempuan: Reflek Sikiat Atas Wacana Agama dan Gender. Yogyakarta: LkiS,

Hutabarat, D. T. H., Bima, M. A., Sirait, A. P. A., Nasution, S., & Sitorus, S. R. 2023. Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Di Desa Tanah Timbul. Jurnal Anadara Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat.

Ishaq. 2018. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

M. Marwan dan Jimmy P. 2009. Kamus Hukum (Dictionary Of Law Complete Edition), Cetakan ke-I. Surabaya: Reality Publisher

Misbach Malim. 2013. Keluarga Sakinah: Dalam Perspektif al-Qur’an dan as- Sunnah. Jakarta: Yayasan Birrul Walidain

Moeljatno. 1987. Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara Muhaimin.2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Irawan, B., & Purba, N. . (2025). A NORMATIVE LURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS BY JUDGES IN DECIDING THEFT CASES IN THE FAMILY (Study of Decision Number 65/Pid.B/2024/PN.Tbt). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 4(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.751