LEGAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPOSING LIGHT CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON DRUGS USERS (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 758 K/Pid.Sus/2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.757Keywords:
Judge's Considerations, Sanctions, NarcoticsAbstract
Law enforcement against narcotics crimes has been widely carried out by law enforcers, and many perpetrators have also been sentenced by court decisions and served their sentences in correctional institutions. The results of the study indicate that the criminal law regulation for drug users based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics prioritizes rehabilitation for drug users, but the criminal sanctions for drug dealers and precursors are very high. The spirit and purpose of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics is to prevent and eradicate the illicit trafficking of narcotics in Indonesia. The policy of formulating criminal sanctions for perpetrators of narcotics crimes in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics is a penal policy in the law, including criminalization policies, qualifications of criminal acts, formulation of criminal sanctions, minimum criminal threats of attempted, assistance and conspiracy, corporate criminal liability.
References
Azhary, Tahir, Negara Hukum, Prenada Kencana Media Group, Jakarta, 2010.
FR, Juliana Lisa dan Nengah Sutrisna, Narkotika, Psikotropika dan Gangguan Jiwa Tinjauan Kesehatan dan Hukum, Nuha Medika, Yogyakarta, 2013.
Gunawan, Yopi dan Krtistian, Perkembangan Konsep Negara Hukum dan Negara Hukum Pancasila. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2015.
Hawari, Dadang, Penyalahgunaan & Ketergatungan Narkotika., Fakultas Kedoteran Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012.
Iskandar, Anang, Distorsi Praktek Penanganan Penyalahguna Narkotika, Viva Tanpas, Jakarta, 2015.
Kaligis. OC. Narkoba dan Peradilannya di Indonesia: Reformasi Hukum Pidana Melalui Perundangan dan Peradilan, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2007.
Krisnawaty, Dani dan Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Khusus, Pena Pundi Aksara, Jakarta, 2006.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
Sianipar, E. P. U. ., Lubis, M. Y. ., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT (SAMENSPANNING) DALAM KEJAHATAN NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.423
Marzuki, M., Faisal, F., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT PERSETUJUAN BERLAYAR (Studi Putusan Nomor 249/Pid.B/2021/PN Ktp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.424
Mustamam, M., Bachri, H. ., & Mukidi, M. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA MELALUI FUNGSI ASESMEN DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Di Kepolisian Sektor Aceh Selatan). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.425
.png){kind=logo}
