A LEGAL REVIEW OF JOINT AND CONSEQUENTIAL LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF DEBT AGREEMENTS (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1017 K/Pdt/2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v3i2.769Keywords:
Default, Agreement, Debt.Abstract
Breach of contract implementation is a phenomenon that often occurs in practice. Many factors cause breach of contract, either due to the fault of the parties or beyond the fault of the parties. A joint liability lawsuit is one form of lawsuit that can be used in civil disputes, namely if one party is in default as in a housing development agreement. As a result of the law of default on the joint liability agreement for debts, the injured party files a lawsuit so that the party causing the loss can complete the payment. Other losses due to default that do not fulfill the debt agreement result in the loss of expected profits if there is no default, so that the parties who cause losses together (jointly liable) must pay and provide compensation for delays and deliberate failure to pay their debts. The conclusion of the discussion is that the legal considerations of the judge in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1017 K / Pdt / 2021 are that the defendants were proven to have purchased goods in the form of granite for which payment was made in installments or installments but until the agreed time the Defendants did not fulfill their obligations to the plaintiffs even though they had been warned by the plaintiffs.
References
Agus Yudha Hernoko, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Koermsial, Aneka Ilmu, Jakarta, 2014.
Ahmadi Miru. Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2014.
Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta, 2018.
Gatot Supramono, Perjanjian Utang Piutang, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2013.
Gunawan Wijaya dan Kartini Muljadi, Penanggungan Utang dan Perikatan Tanggung Menanggung, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.
Hartono Soerjopratiknjo, Hutang Piutang Perjanjian Pembayaran dan Jaminan Hipotik, Seksi Notaris FH.UGM. Yogyakarta, 2014.
H.M.N. Purwosutjipto, Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia, Djambatan, Jakarta, 2012.
I.G. Rai Widjaya, Hukum Perusahaan dan Undang-Undang dan Peraturan Pelaksanaan di Bidang Usaha. KBI, Jakarta, 2016.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
.png){kind=logo}
