ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL VERDICT FOR THE CRIMINAL ACT OF RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS (Study of Decision Number 155/Pid.B/20245/PN. Sei Rampah)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i2.762Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Reception, Proceeds of TheftAbstract
The regulation of receiving the proceeds of theft according to the law in force in Indonesia is regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code and the factors causing the receiving of the proceeds of theft are due to economic and financial factors. The economic life of the perpetrator who is less able both in terms of economy and education. Economic factors are the most important element and apply generally to almost every case of receiving the proceeds of theft, so this factor is not too tied to the perpetrator, time, and place. Based on the research results, it is known that efforts to overcome the reception of the proceeds of theft are pre-emptive efforts, repressive efforts, and preventive efforts. The judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 155 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN. Sei Rampah are that all elements of 480 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled and there are no justifications and excuses, so that they are found guilty, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors.
References
Bambang Purnomo, Orientasi Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Amarta Yogyakarta, 2014.
Bambang Sunggono., Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa, Jakarta, 2013
M. Hamdan., Tindak Pidana Suap dan Money Politics, Pustaka Bangsa Press, Medan, 2015.
Moeljatno, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 2012.
Sholehudin, Sistem Sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana (Ide Dasar Double Track Sistem dan Implementasinya), PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014.
Soerjono Soekanto., Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2014
Tri Andrisman, Asas-Asas dan Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia, UI Press, Jakarta, 2019.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
Sianipar, E. P. U. ., Lubis, M. Y. ., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT (SAMENSPANNING) DALAM KEJAHATAN NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.423
Marzuki, M., Faisal, F., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT PERSETUJUAN BERLAYAR (Studi Putusan Nomor 249/Pid.B/2021/PN Ktp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.424
Mustamam, M., Bachri, H. ., & Mukidi, M. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA MELALUI FUNGSI ASESMEN DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Di Kepolisian Sektor Aceh Selatan). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.425
Gulo, I. E. ., Mukidi, M., & Mustamam, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN DIVERSI DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK ATAS TINDAK KEJAHATAN PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Gunung Sitoli). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.426
.png){kind=logo}
