LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL ACT OF EMBASSY IN OFFICE COMMITTED BY THE SALES SUPERVISOR OF PT. MITRA CIPTA JAYA MEDAN (Analysis of Medan District Court Decision No. 30/Pid.B/2022/PN Mdn)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v3i2.700Keywords:
Crime, Embezzlement, Position.Abstract
The crime of embezzlement which is a crime often occurs in various fields and even the perpetrators are in various layers of society. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how the legal arrangements for the crime of office embezzlement continue, what is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement in office in decision Number 30/Pid.B/2022/PN Mdn, what are the considerations of judges in deciding cases of embezzlement in position on an ongoing basis according to decision Number 30/Pid.B/2022/PN Mdn. Legal arrangements for the crime of embezzlement of office are regulated in Article 374 of the Criminal Code. The occurrence of criminal acts of embezzlement in positions related to assets and objects, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement in office is that the defendant is sentenced to a prison sentence of 2 (two) years. The conclusion from the discussion is that the judge's legal considerations in the application of criminal sanctions for the crime of embezzlement in office in decision Number 30/Pid.B/2022/PN Mdn against the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement in office can be held accountable for the actions committed with the consideration that at the time of committing the act the defendant aware of the consequences, the perpetrator in carrying out his actions is in a healthy condition and is capable of considering his actions.
References
Amrani, Hanafi dan Mahrus Ali, Sisitem Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2015.
Arief, Barda Nawawi, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2017.
Bawengan, G.W. Penyidikan Perkara Pidana dan Tehnik Interograsi, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2014.
Chazawi, Adami, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2, Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta, 2017.
Effendi, Erdianto, Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Refika Adiama, Jakarta, 2011.
Farid, Zainal Abidin, Hukum Pidana I, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2017.
Fajar ND, Mukti dan Yulianto, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2010.
Gosita, Arif, Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Akademika Presindo, Jakarta , 2014.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
Sianipar, E. P. U. ., Lubis, M. Y. ., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT (SAMENSPANNING) DALAM KEJAHATAN NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Putusan Nomor 57/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.423
Marzuki, M., Faisal, F., & Akhyar, A. . (2023). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT PERSETUJUAN BERLAYAR (Studi Putusan Nomor 249/Pid.B/2021/PN Ktp). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.424
Mustamam, M., Bachri, H. ., & Mukidi, M. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA MELALUI FUNGSI ASESMEN DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Di Kepolisian Sektor Aceh Selatan). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.425
Gulo, I. E. ., Mukidi, M., & Mustamam, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN DIVERSI DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK ATAS TINDAK KEJAHATAN PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Gunung Sitoli). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.426
.png){kind=logo}
