THE ROLE OF WITNESS AND VICTIM PROTECTION AGENCIES IN PROTECTING WITNESSES OF MURDER (Study of Medan District Court Decision Number 834/Pid.B/2023/PN Mdn)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v4i3.886Keywords:
Protection, Witnesses and Victims, Murder.Abstract
The existence of Witnesses and Victims is very important in disclosing criminal acts in the criminal justice process. Therefore, Witnesses and Victims are given protection at all stages of the criminal justice process. Provisions regarding protected legal subjects in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Witness and Victim Protection. The conclusion of the discussion is that the regulation of legal protection for witnesses and victims in protecting witnesses of murder crimes is regulated in Law No. 31 of 2014. The responsibility of LPSK must protect witnesses and victims from threats, in addition to regulating the authority and responsibility. The judge's legal considerations in the Medan District Court decision Number 834 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN Mdn regarding the importance of LPSK accompanying victims in the trial process is to provide more comprehensive, just and humane protection for victims and their families in accordance with the authority inherent in him in the manner and pattern regulated in the capacity of authority in providing assistance to the victim's family and making relevant calculations.
References
Abdussalam, R. DPM Sitompul, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, PTIK Press, Jakarta, 2015.
Ali, Zainuddin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2019.
Beccaria, Cesare. Perihal Kejahatan dan Hukuman. Genta Publishing. Yogyakarta. 2011.
Chaerudin dan F. Fadillah., Korban Kejahatan Dalam Perspektif Viktimologi dan Hukum Pidana Islam, Grhadhika Press, Jakarta, 2014.
Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo, Pemetaan Legislasi Indonesia Terkait Dengan Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Aneka Ilmu, Jakarta, 2015.
Fernando, Basil, Arti Penting Perlindungan Saksi, Buletin Kesaksian, LPSK, Jakarta, 2018
Gosita, Arief, Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta, 2013.
Hamzah, Andi, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016
Harahap, M. Yahya, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2018
Harkrisnowo, Harkristuti, Urgensi Perlindungan Saksi, FH Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2019.
Loqman, Loebby, Laporan Akhir Tim Naskah Akademis Peraturan Perundang-undangan Tentang Perlindungan Saksi Korban Kejahatan, BPHN, Jakarta, 2010.
Akhyaruddin, A., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DARI HASIL TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 250 K/Pid.Sus/2018). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.420
Akhyar, A., Danialsyah, D., & Bukhari, B. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PEMERKOSAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 271/Pid.B/2019/PN Mrb). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.421
Simalango, D. ., Marzuki, M., & Mukidi, M. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA OLEH KURATOR ATAS TINDAKANNYA YANG MERUGIKAN BUNDEL PAILIT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 2081/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst). Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.422
.png){kind=logo}
