DISCRETION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS IN HANDLING CHILDREN WHO COMMIT CRIMES: A STUDY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v7i3.927Kata Kunci:
Discretionary power, Law enforcement, Juvenile delinquency, Restorative justice, Child rights.Abstrak
The discretionary power of law enforcement officials in handling juvenile delinquency cases represents a critical juncture where legal formalism intersects with restorative justice principles. This study examines the extent to which law enforcement discretion aligns with restorative justice frameworks when processing children in conflict with the law. Utilizing a qualitative approach with case study methodology, this research analyzes 45 cases of juvenile delinquency handled by law enforcement agencies across three jurisdictions over a two-year period (2022-2024). Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 30 law enforcement officials, legal practitioners, and juvenile justice stakeholders, supplemented by document analysis of case files and policy documents. The findings reveal significant variations in discretionary practices, with compliance rates to restorative justice principles ranging from 42% to 78% across jurisdictions. Key factors influencing discretionary decisions include organizational culture, training exposure to restorative justice approaches, severity of offenses, victim-offender dynamics, and institutional support mechanisms. The study identifies four discretionary typologies: formalistic enforcers, contextual mediators, welfare-oriented facilitators, and hybrid practitioners. While formal policies endorse restorative approaches, implementation gaps persist due to insufficient training, limited resources, ambiguous procedural guidelines, and resistance to paradigm shifts from retributive to restorative models. The research contributes to juvenile justice literature by mapping the discretionary landscape and its alignment with restorative justice imperatives, offering evidence-based recommendations for policy reform, capacity building, and institutional strengthening to enhance child-centered justice delivery systems.
Referensi
Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2005). Juvenile justice reform and restorative justice: Building theory and policy from practice. Willan Publishing.
Bergseth, K. J., & Bouffard, J. A. (2007). The long-term impact of restorative justice programming for juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(4), 433-451.
Bishop, D. M. (2005). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice processing. In D. F. Hawkins & K. Kempf-Leonard (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 23-82). University of Chicago Press.
Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. Academic Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
Brank, E. M., Kucera, S. C., & Hays, S. A. (2008). Parental responsibility statutes: An organization and policy implications analysis. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 7(1), 1-55.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brunson, R. K., & Weitzer, R. (2009). Police relations with black and white youths in different urban neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 44(6), 858-885.
Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(6), 741-760.
Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Kimonis, E., Steinberg, L., Chassin, L., & Fagan, J. (2007). Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 31(6), 519-535.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
Cipriani, D. (2009). Children's rights and the minimum age of criminal responsibility: A global perspective. Ashgate Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cunneen, C., & Goldson, B. (2015). Restorative justice? A critical analysis. In B. Goldson & J. Muncie (Eds.), Youth crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 137-156). SAGE Publications.
Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9-29.
Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Louisiana State University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Dünkel, F., Grzywa-Holten, J., & Horsfield, P. (Eds.). (2017). Restorative justice and mediation in penal matters: A stock-taking of legal issues, implementation strategies and outcomes in 36 European countries. Forum Verlag Godesberg.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Engel, R. S. (2001). Supervisory styles of patrol sergeants and lieutenants. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(4), 341-355.
Fader, J. J., Kurlychek, M. C., & Morgan, K. A. (2015). The color of juvenile justice: Racial disparities in dispositional decisions. Social Science Research, 44, 126-140.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men's perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255-279.
Gavrielides, T. (2021). Restorative justice and the right to desistance. International Journal of Restorative Justice, 4(2), 174-198.
Goldson, B., & Muncie, J. (Eds.). (2015). Youth crime and justice (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Goldstein, J. (1960). Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low-visibility decisions in the administration of justice. Yale Law Journal, 69(4), 543-594.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Hawkins, K. (2003). Law as last resort: Prosecution decision-making in a regulatory agency. Oxford University Press.
Hayes, H. (2005). Assessing reoffending in restorative justice conferences. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 77-101.
Hoyle, C., & Zedner, L. (2007). Victims, victimization, and criminal justice. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (4th ed., pp. 461-495). Oxford University Press.
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE Publications.
Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of restorative justice. Willan Publishing.
